[Archers] Submitting scores for IKAC or Royal Rounds

[Fen & Michelle]

Ooops. I thought the 2 marshal rule was only for scores approaching 100+.  My mistake. 
That means all the scores I submitted under "Longbow" need to be yanked, as I was the only one there. 
No worries, I can re-shoot my Longbow on Sundays with other marshals.

Cheers
Fen

Atlantian Archery. Nothing exists within 100 yards without our permission.

 

________________________________
 From: Jay Nardone <jaynardone at comcast.net>
To: archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org 
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:21 PM
Subject: [Archers] Submitting scores for IKAC or Royal Rounds
  


Good evening everyone, just a quick reminder for our marshal’s that practice events must have 2 marshal’s present for scoring. This is our current rule and exceptions can be granted from me or my Emergency DEM provided we agree with the request. I have been noticing marshal’s submitting scores for themselves and it is hard to see if any other marshals were present at those practices. We have always and will continue to work on our honor, but please try to follow the rules. If I find out that a marshal shot and recorded their scores alone, I will reject those scores in the system as this breaks our current rules. 
 
Also in standing with the new social media policy, if you advertise on yahoo, Face Book, etc and use the “SCA” or your local group name in the title or post itself, it makes that an official SCA practice. If you make a post that simply says, “Practice at joe blows house Tuesday night” this would not be considered an official SCA practice by the rules change. 
 
If there are any questions please feel free to ask
 
In Service,
 
Janyn
 
_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20131002/56093893/attachment-0002.htm>