[Archers] Archers Digest, Vol 101, Issue 16

[Jamie Frailey]

I think the problem with archers is that the Chiv does consider archery a chivalric weapons form. I think if you break it down one can see that might be true since there is no close engagement. But archers behavior and the investment in our discipline certainly is chivalric.


On Feb 15, 2012, at 6:27 AM, loreleielkins at aol.com wrote:

> I think that one of the issues was the the Chiv was so unitedly opposed to including archers included in a 4th peerage.  :-)  I guess we scare them.  But, draw your own conclusions.  The survey and results are posted at www.sca.org.  It is an interesting read.
> 
> Lorelei
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Janyn Fletcher <janynfletcher at comcast.net>
> To: loreleielkins <loreleielkins at aol.com>; jamie <jamie at designbyfive.com>; archers <archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
> Sent: Tue, Feb 14, 2012 8:45 pm
> Subject: RE: [Archers] Archers Digest, Vol 101, Issue 16
> 
> Sent mine a few minutes ago. I had heard at Pennsic that the positive responses were less than 50% and maybe this is why they are asking for more support? This confuses me because I could not imagine any active and involved archers not supporting this??? Lorelei is right, now is the time to be heard. Take a minute and send your thoughts in.
>  
> YIS, Janyn
>  
>  

Regards,

Jamie Frailey
jamie at designbyfive.com

c. 443.834.8141
p. 443.615.7264

225 East Redwood Street, 3rd Floor
Baltimore, MD 21202





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20120215/00115fb9/attachment-0003.htm>