[Archers] Archers Digest, Vol 101, Issue 16
loreleielkins at aol.com
loreleielkins at aol.com
Wed Feb 15 03:27:14 PST 2012
I think that one of the issues was the the Chiv was so unitedly opposed to including archers included in a 4th peerage. :-) I guess we scare them. But, draw your own conclusions. The survey and results are posted at www.sca.org. It is an interesting read.
Lorelei
-----Original Message-----
From: Janyn Fletcher <janynfletcher at comcast.net>
To: loreleielkins <loreleielkins at aol.com>; jamie <jamie at designbyfive.com>; archers <archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
Sent: Tue, Feb 14, 2012 8:45 pm
Subject: RE: [Archers] Archers Digest, Vol 101, Issue 16
Sent mine a few minutes ago. I had heard at Pennsic that the positive responses were less than 50% and maybe this is why they are asking for more support? This confuses me because I could not imagine any active and involved archers not supporting this??? Lorelei is right, now is the time to be heard. Take a minute and send your thoughts in.
YIS, Janyn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20120215/182af7ae/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the Archers
mailing list