[Archers] Congratulations!

[John Atkins]

Let me say to all on this list.  Baron Seigefried is more versed in the
rules and regulations or our acticity thatn most. When he voices an
opinion it is done in te vien of correction and NOT done in the vien of
personal attack.   Please take that into account.
 
cog

-----Original Message-----
From: archers-bounces at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
[mailto:archers-bounces at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org] On Behalf Of
fenrisulven at comcast.net
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 7:55 PM
To: Siegfried
Cc: archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Subject: Re: [Archers] Congratulations!




Barun Siegfried: "I wished to step out, however, being directly
addressed as I have been"

 

You made comments that warranted a response.  Posting and then fleeing
the thread does not end discussion.


 

 

"I suggest you work within your Barony/Shire/etc to come up with a
document that explains how the relationships between autocrat/mic/
marshals/feastocrat/etc work"

 

Do you have one I could look over?  You continue to insist that
autocrats have the right to cancel archery on the day of the event, at a
whim and without cause.  Where are you getting this from?  I would like
to see it for myself. 


 

"I wish this had not been brought up in public, for I have no desire to
drag dirt and muck... PLEASE do not deign to discuss items of which you
do not truly know the details"

 

Please don't play the victim here.  You were the one who brought this up
in public, claiming that "in this neck of the woods, all autocrats
always work hand-in-hand closely with their marshalls." All I did was
counter with examples to show its clearly not the case. Its hardly "dirt
and muck" to point out that, despite your assertions, your barony faces
the same issue as the rest of the kingdom.

 

 

"All 'problems' that occurred at HRM were *NOT* problems of the
autocrat. ...problems that existed there were completely because [the
MIC] was not active in the planning process ...direct your anger
somewhere else than the autocrat"

 

I'm not blaming the autocrat. And I never said my anger was directed
there. These discussions center around the need for MICs to work more
closely with their Autocrats, to educate them about kingdom-directed
policy so they don't make decisions based in ignorance. In the course of
that conversation, we look at prior events to see what went wrong and
what can be done to improve future events. Its not about casting blame.
We should be allowed to have honest and objective discussions about
event archery without having to preface every remark with "I'm not
pointing fingers, but..."

 

Also, I apologize if my manner with you has been disrespectful.  I know
print formats like this do not always convey tone accurately, but yours
has always come across to me as bullying, so I tend to reflexively
respond in kind. You and I will probably just have to agree to disagree.

 

 

Cheers

Fen

 

 

--- Atlantian Archery. Nothing exists within 100 yards without our
explicit permission ---

 

.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20100927/6bc3ad02/attachment-0003.htm>