[Archers] Congratulations!

[Siegfried]

I will point out again, then step out of this conversation, that you are
assuming that there is a 'right' for archery to happen.

If an autocrat makes a decision that precludes archery, or that impacts
archery negatively.  That was not an 'error' on their part.

It was their decision as autocrat to make.

In this 'neck' of the woods, (Where both Jerry and I are from), all
autocrats always work hand-in-hand closely with their marshals, and
people come to an agreement.  If the autocrat doesn't feel a space
exists that will work with their otherwise event-concept for archery.
Then there's no archery.

In Service,
Siegfried

PS.  If you want to make an 'autocrat' manual/class within your own
Baronies, go for it.  Have at it.  But I will not back the idea of
adding that load at a Kingdom Level.


On 9/26/10 6:55 PM, Wayne Himes wrote:
> Ok,
> 
> I disagree we are not over thinking this.
> 
> As pointed out we have cases where the autocrat is making changes
> without making sure it is not a problem but if we can't help the
> autocrat keep from making errors and no the check list should not be
> 16 pages. Just big enough to help cover the basics and as part.of a
> handbook that helps keep them from making real errors.
> 
> Just my take on it.
> 
> Chon


-- 
Barun Siegfried Sebastian Faust - Barony of Highland Foorde - Atlantia
http://hf.atlantia.sca.org/ - http://crossbows.biz/ - http://eliw.com/