[Archers] Pennsic

[Holly Gibbons]

Dear Lord Janyn:

Quite the contrary, I do not think anything has gone wrong. I actually think we 
are having an incredibly open, polite, thoughtful, and extremely helpful and 
detailed discussion on this list. 


We are at the point where we need to articulate our visions in a thoughtful way 
and present them to the individual who is the MIC of archery for next Pennsic. 
Preferably in person  :)

I suggest we continue. We will need a document that outlines the issues in a 
respectful and cogent manner, that is emotionally compelling. We will need to 
state our case in a way that helps the MIC understand that we are not at 
cross-purposes at all. We will need to present several ideas (plan A, plan B, 
etc.) so that a multitude of "solutions" to our dilemma can be seen and laid out 
for consideration.

Thank you Siegfried for your enormously interesting and persuasive posting just 
now on running a big shoot fast! Wow!

I hope to see everyone at TnT tomorrow where no doubt we can do a little 
in-person talking. It's always very helpful.

Love you all, Nuala


 

________________________________
From: Jay Nardone <jaynardone at comcast.net>
To: Holly Gibbons <holly0920 at yahoo.com>; archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Sent: Fri, October 29, 2010 3:13:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Archers] Pennsic


This thread has gone terribly wrong, all of a sudden many are taking personal 
issue with a simple discussion. This is why I suggested in the beginning that we 
save discussion until a few things are complete first. I don’t know of a soul 
here who has bad intent in their postings yet once again personal offenses are 
being taken. I think we should wait to see number one if this is even feasible 
and will be allowed in a manner that is conducive to it being productive, two we 
select a leader for this event to spear head what and how this happens. 


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20101029/500a407c/attachment-0003.htm>