[MR] Term Usage

[ldmolly at md.metrocast.net]

You know, we're discussing much of chivalry and courtesy from a fighter standpoint. It might be good to also consider it from a spectator standpoint as well. As a spectator, I am observing much more of a fighter's action off the field rather than on it (perhaps unkindly, but it is true). If someone bowls me over on their way to the list field or spares me not a kind word though I bring them water, I will think less of them (in terms of an "ideal" fighter) than someone who engages me. It has little to do with their prowess, but I tend to think of them as less "chivalric" (in the modern sense). I think the same could be said for an artisan who is non-communicative when asked about their project or a service person who performs their work sourly. 


Courtesy is not judged only by someone's actions on the fighting field (or while participating in an A&S display or working at Gate)...it should not be put on and off like a Sunday suit, smile...only used when company comes (or when someone is watching). Your courtesy is your outward gift to the people around you: it's taking time to respond to a greeting, to thank those who try to help you, to take a moment to carry a burden for those who labor. It's the nod as you walk by someone's pavillion, the bow to your inspiration or Crown, the accepting of someone's favor as if it MEANT something. None of this has anything to do with prowess, but it is just as inspiring when it is seen (and even more so when you are on the receiving end of the courtesy). 


I don't know that this adds anything of concrete value to the diiscussion, but as a spectator, I am looking for more than prowess in those I want to admire. As a specator, I can appreciate prowess, but I admire courtesy. And that makes a much longer-lasting impression on me when I think about a fighter.  

Molly