[MR] Greetings, thanks, and notice: a heraldic question

[Terry Buyers]

Or submit a device and then ignore the heralds in all subsequent 
communications, which is pretty much what I've done for years. If I 
ever manage to get a weekend off to make an event in your area, check 
my battle banner (made for me by a former Laurel King at Arms) for my 
opinion on the entire situation. 

Especially after having a registered device for over 20 years and then 
having the heralds change said device for some paper-shuffling reason. 

Gave up trying to get things straightened out over 5 years ago and just 
use the original device or my household colors quartered. The point is 
to have some sort of heraldry attached to you so we can recognize you 
on the field when you get that pretty new armor none of us has seen 
before. 

To paraphrase Napoleon speaking about the Pope, "Laurel King at Arms? 
Really? How big an army does he have?"

               Taras




On Wednesday 11 May 2005 12:53, Aimee Kratts wrote:

>
> Can someone clarify for us new and part-time heralds this point on
> the rules:
>
> I've been told that as soon as someone submits paperwork for a
> device, that person can begin to use the device...whether it has
> passed or not.
>
> Subsequently, if the device passes, everything is cool. If the device
> doesn't pass, than the person must resubmit again, stop using the
> failed device and start using the resubmitted device.
>
> Is this correct?
>

-- 


http://sirknight.home.mindspring.com


"There is no Constitutional right to be protected 
by the state against being murdered by criminals
and madmen."
1982 US Court of Appeals,
Bavers vs. DeVito