[MR] Comments on Proposed revision of Corpora IV.A.1.

[Logan]

think of it more as a clarification than a change.  most rules are written
to prevent things that are felt to be detrimental.  to hire on thugs to win
the crown would be detrimental on many aspects.  again, if it were to go
that way you would see the same group simply handing off the crown to their
own.  the purpose this clarification serves, in my opinion, is to make sure
the politics are kept to a minimum and that a fighters ability and skill are
put to the test.  the contest is judged on an individuals fortitude and
strength and not on his marketability and campaigning.

just an opinion,
logan

-----Original Message-----
From: atlantia-admin at atlantia.sca.org
[mailto:atlantia-admin at atlantia.sca.org]On Behalf Of Robert Busek
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 9:15 AM
To: atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subject: Re: [MR] Comments on Proposed revision of Corpora IV.A.1.


I must concur with Lord Frederich.  Why does the BoD
find it necessary to alter Corpora in this way?  What
purpose does it serve?

As a non-heavy fighter (and therefore a non-candidate
for the Crown either now or in the future), I am
perplexed by the lack of reasons given for this
change.  And while I have no quarrel with the BoD, I
find that the changes they propose to Corpora often
come with no explanation of why they feel the changes
are necessary.  I don't think that the BoD would make
changes for the sake of the change, so can anyone
explain this to the populace at large?

Pro Deo et Atlantia,
Lord Robert of Canterbury

--- Neil Brady <teufel at mail.abs.adelphia.net> wrote:
> >	The following are my comments to the Board
> concerning a
> >proposed change to Corpora.  Commentary by the
> members and interested
> parties is
> >requested and may be sent until July 1, 2002.
> >
> >	Proposed revision of Corpora IV.A.1.
> >
> >	The Board requests commentary from the membership
> regarding
> >the following proposed revision of Corpora IV.A.1.:
> >
> >	Change from: "Royal Lists must be conducted at a
> tournament
> >announced in the kingdom newsletter as being for
> that purpose."
> >
> >	Change to: "Royal Lists must be conducted at a
> tournament
> >announced in the kingdom newsletter as being for
> that purpose. All Combat in
> >Royal Lists must be single combat."
>
> I beg the readers indulgence, and request that the
> more learned members
> here educate me on this matter.
>
> If I read this correctly, the proposed change reads
> that, essentially, "all
> future Crown Lists in the Known World must be single
> combat," not  "if we
> don't make these changes, all future Crown Lists
> will be mercenary melees."
>
> If my knowledge of Society history is correct, there
> have been hundreds of
> Crown Lists.  Under the law as it is currently
> written, we have had one
> King, in one Kingdom, run one Crown List which
> included melee as part of
> it's competition.  Is the King who was chosen this
> way such an unchivalrous
> monster that this law must be implemented to rectify
> the situation?  I
> don't recollect any mention of that on any list I
> belong to.
>
> I'm not sure I see the danger to our current system
> of choosing the next
> Prince/Princess.  Is this such a Pandora's Box, that
> now one incident has
> occurred, all sorts of outlandish ideas will be put
> forth for running Crown
> List by future Kings?
>
> I am under the impression that in many Kingdoms the
> current Crown gets to
> choose how he would like his Crown list to be run,
> and chooses among those
> who put in Letters of Intent who he finds suitable
> for the competition.  I
> know some Kingdoms even allow the current King to
> over-rule Kingdom law in
> order to run the Crown List exactly as he would
> like, so long as he still
> meets Society Law (as in the Kingdom of Trimaris
> where a recent King
> allowed shields larger than normal, so long as they
> were historically
> accurate, while specifically banning the very common
> 'flat rectagle' from
> the competition.)  In what Kingdom is it allowed for
> the participants of
> Crown Lists to behave in an unchivalrous manner
> without fear of
> consequences?  Would not an individual or group of
> people who had openly
> abused the King's rules of the Crown List in order
> to win, by hook or
> crook, be brought promptly before a Court of
> Chivalry?  If this is so, and
> that check to the unchivalrousness of competitors
> exists, why is any change
> to Corpora necessary?
>
> Please, I beg for your kind tutelege in this matter.
>
>
> Your Unworthy Supplicant,
>
> Lord Frederich Von Teufel
>
========================================================================
>                    The Merry Rose Tavern at
> Cheapside
>     List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
>   Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
> Subscriptions:
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com
========================================================================
                   The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
    List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
  Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia