[MR] Curiosity
Beiskaldi at aol.com
Beiskaldi at aol.com
Fri Feb 1 05:31:03 PST 2002
Drea, was your question on the specific instance of Aveloc himself or the BoD's practice & methods in general?
I think we have enough to keep our populace amused here in our own kingdom. I really don't feel that it is chivalrous or honorable to draw opinions or place blame in an instance that most of us know nothing about except for incomplete, tertiary information we have received from biased parties.
The URL you gave is that of the Count himself, and really does not give concrete evidence of the BoD's proceedings or actions. Is there a website or somewhere we can go to get *that* information?
YIS,
thyra
In a message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2002 5:43:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, Aedan Aylwyn <aedan at mindspring.com> writes:
>
> >I was curious what those on this list think about the way that Revocation and
> >Denial of Membership (R&D) is handled by the BoD. In the Jan 2002 meeting,
> >Count
> >(twice) Aveloc of AnTir was issued an R&D from the board. This R&D, if nothing
>
> I'm not sure about the process itself, but from what I've heard, it was
> long overdue.
> There was definitely a lot of documentation to the process and as a friend
> put it,
> it wasn't for any one incident of Aveloc's but a "lifetime achievement
> award" for
> all the harm he'd done.
>
> >website provided by Count Aveloc and his lady, Countess Mahliqa at
> >http://scaoubliette.com/. There is also a petition to suggest to the BoD that
>
> Be careful reading this. It's obviously very prejudiced (not that I blame
> him) but
> highly misleading. As one "for instance", there's a accusation of him
> attacking
> and holding someone's head underwater at a Lillies War. The accusation letter
> states "some 3 years ago", to which his response was "I wasn't even at Lillies
> 3 years ago". Sounds like a smear tactic unless you know that letter was
> written
> a few years ago so it was 3 years *from the time of the letter* and the
> incident
> he's trying to side step had many other witnesses. Hard to forget doing
> something like that to a person.
>
> The BoD seems to move *very* slowly and cautiously in things of this nature.
> Having been involved in similar proceedings here in this kingdom, all I can
> say is
> if they actually went through with it, it was most likely due to
> overwhelming evidence.
>
> My opinionated tuppence,
> Aedan
> ----------
> Baron Aedan Aylwyn, Provost Caer Mear, Atlantia
> Email: aedan at mindspring.com Royal Bad Influence - Retired
> Academie d'Espee: http://www.mindspring.com/~aedan
> * * Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla * *
>
> ========================================================================
> The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
> List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
> Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
> Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia
More information about the Atlantia
mailing list