[MR] Re: Mists of Avalon

[Morghana at aol.com]

In a message dated 7/19/01 1:50:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Istvanwrites:


> I don't recall that the book itself was particularly historical accurate.
> But then again, it was a work of fantasy, like all other tellings of the
> Arthurian legend, so I don't think we ought to be making it represent
> history.
> 

THANK YOU!!!  While I dearly love all the retellings of the Arthurian saga, I 
think this point is the most important.  Without harder historical proof....  
they are legends, stories, tales......  albeit good ones.

Don't try to force them into a mold of "historical accuracy", when they're 
not.  Enjoy them for what they ARE, and let the rest .... just rest.

~Morghana 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/atlantia-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20010719/0450449c/attachment-0023.htm>