[Archers] ATLatl rules

[Jay Nardone]

I like that Master Jonathas! Let's go with your suggestion then. Can you
please update the listing on the page?

 

Thanks

 

Janyn

 

 

From: james.kriebel at gmail.com [mailto:james.kriebel at gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Jonathas
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 7:28 PM
To: Janyn Fletcher, (Atlantia)
Cc: archers
Subject: Re: [Archers] ATLatl rules

 

If you don't make the ranks a 40 point spread then the top rank will only be
half way up the point scale.  Another option might be to keep the rank names
you already put out and split each in half using a common sub rank name,
for example Gold and Silver (or if you wanted to keep more in like with the
weapon Iron and Bronze). With the lower sub rank being the bottom 20 points
and the other being the top 20 points.  So you would end up with Bronze
Caveman at 0-19, Iron Caveman at 20-39, Bronze Thrower at 40-59, Iron
Thrower at 60-80 etc....

That setup would keep the same relative ranks to archery, yet still have
small advancement steps every 20 points.

Just an idea....

Jonathas

On Sep 4, 2013 5:56 PM, "Jay Nardone" <jaynardone at comcast.net> wrote:

Good evening everyone, just one last point I want to clear up on the rules.
Since we adopted the 10 - 1 scoring, would we want to double the ranking
requirements for each rank to match? So instead of 0-20 as Thrower, it would
be 0-40, Huntsman would be 41- 80, etc.

 

We never defined this in the discussion.

 

What do you all think?

 

Janyn

 


_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20130904/730637b9/attachment-0003.htm>