[Archers] ATLatl rules

[Jonathas]

If you don't make the ranks a 40 point spread then the top rank will only
be half way up the point scale.  Another option might be to keep the rank
names you already put out and split each in half using a common sub rank
name,  for example Gold and Silver (or if you wanted to keep more in like
with the weapon Iron and Bronze). With the lower sub rank being the bottom
20 points and the other being the top 20 points.  So you would end up with
Bronze Caveman at 0-19, Iron Caveman at 20-39, Bronze Thrower at 40-59,
Iron Thrower at 60-80 etc....

That setup would keep the same relative ranks to archery, yet still have
small advancement steps every 20 points.

Just an idea....

Jonathas
On Sep 4, 2013 5:56 PM, "Jay Nardone" <jaynardone at comcast.net> wrote:

> Good evening everyone, just one last point I want to clear up on the
> rules. Since we adopted the 10 – 1 scoring, would we want to double the
> ranking requirements for each rank to match? So instead of 0-20 as Thrower,
> it would be 0-40, Huntsman would be 41- 80, etc.****
>
> ** **
>
> We never defined this in the discussion.****
>
> ** **
>
> What do you all think?****
>
> ** **
>
> Janyn****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archers mailing list
> Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
> http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20130904/80670c29/attachment-0003.htm>