[Archers] Archery policy changes

[loreleielkins at aol.com]

I agree completely.  This review of policy will take care of that.  If you or anyone can think of any other discrepancies, please send them along.


Lorelei


-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathas <Jonathas at RedFoxDen.org>
To: Siegfried <siegfried at crossbows.biz>
Cc: archers <archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
Sent: Tue, Feb 22, 2011 5:54 am
Subject: Re: [Archers] Archery policy changes


I thought at the very end the previous EM had taken the time to formalize his 'discretionary ruling'.  Grrrr, ok it is just wrong to have "unwritten"/conflicting rule out there!

Thanks for the correction Siegfried!
Jonathas



On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Siegfried <siegfried at crossbows.biz> wrote:

Actually Baron Jonathas ... the new ruling was never actually put in place.

It was put forward by the previous Earl Marshal, for comment, and after
the uproar over how it was worded, he stated that it would apply as a
'discretionary ruling / interpretation' for that year/summer, and then
he would evaluate it further before making it permanent.

He never made it permanent/official before he stepped down.

Lorelei has been examining/evaluating the rules, and requested for that
time-being that we all operated under the 'new guidance', but knowing
that it's only that at the moment.

She will come up with final wording, as part of this new process I'm sure.

In Service,
Siegfried







 
_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20110222/081e77cb/attachment-0003.htm>