[Archers] Congratulations!

[Wayne Himes]

Ok. I don't really care enough to reword my statements to do a better job of getting my point across.  

I don't think I can be constructive in adding to the discussion I will step out of it.

Chon

Siegfried <siegfried at crossbows.biz> wrote:

>I will point out again, then step out of this conversation, that you are
>assuming that there is a 'right' for archery to happen.
>
>If an autocrat makes a decision that precludes archery, or that impacts
>archery negatively.  That was not an 'error' on their part.
>
>It was their decision as autocrat to make.
>
>In this 'neck' of the woods, (Where both Jerry and I are from), all
>autocrats always work hand-in-hand closely with their marshals, and
>people come to an agreement.  If the autocrat doesn't feel a space
>exists that will work with their otherwise event-concept for archery.
>Then there's no archery.
>
>In Service,
>Siegfried
>
>PS.  If you want to make an 'autocrat' manual/class within your own
>Baronies, go for it.  Have at it.  But I will not back the idea of
>adding that load at a Kingdom Level.
>
>
>On 9/26/10 6:55 PM, Wayne Himes wrote:
>> Ok,
>> 
>> I disagree we are not over thinking this.
>> 
>> As pointed out we have cases where the autocrat is making changes
>> without making sure it is not a problem but if we can't help the
>> autocrat keep from making errors and no the check list should not be
>> 16 pages. Just big enough to help cover the basics and as part.of a
>> handbook that helps keep them from making real errors.
>> 
>> Just my take on it.
>> 
>> Chon
>
>
>-- 
>Barun Siegfried Sebastian Faust - Barony of Highland Foorde - Atlantia
>http://hf.atlantia.sca.org/ - http://crossbows.biz/ - http://eliw.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Archers mailing list
>Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
>http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org
>