[Archers] Atlantian archery winter challenge . . . .

[Jonathas]

No "rule" required, it is always the archer's choice to submit any score,
high or low, for any reason.

Jonathas

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:36 PM, <fenrisulven at comcast.net> wrote:

>
>
> We considered that - a kind of Anaconda scoring.  The thought was that,
> if you had a bad 1st end, you could then shoot the other 3 ends with the
> goal of racking up the most negative points.  But then someone pointed out
> that if you got negatives while going for positives in the first place,
> you'd likely get positives when trying for negatives!  So its unlikely
> someone would match the high score that route (and now my head is starting
> to hurt)
>
>
>
> Also, the scoring is not exactly in equilibrium because there is a -1
> penalty for each non-scoring arrow (hitting just paper or missing entirely).
>
>
>
> I am looking forward to posting my own worst scores.  How low can ya go?
> :)   I think it will be a side-match between several of us, winner buys the
> brew.
>
> But in case if anyone might be uncomfortable with posting negative totals,
> we can always rule that you don't *have* to turn in scores that are less
> than 1.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Fen
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20101116/69561c76/attachment-0003.htm>