[Archers] FW: RE: Royal Round web site
Greg Christensen
gcjckc at hotmail.com
Sun Nov 19 09:41:51 PST 2006
>From: Robyn Becker <reyne_telarius at hotmail.com>
>To: Greg Christensen <gcjckc at hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: [Archers] Royal Round web site
>Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:00:54 -0500
>
>I imagine there isn't an'official' rank for 120 and above since so few
>people Society wide have actually attained it. BUt since the scoring trend
>is for a new rank every 20 points, if someone is hitting 120, then there
>should be an official rank for that score. I strongly suggest that we make
>the rank official, and add it to the rules. SInce Unevent is coming up
>soon, it can be discussed and finalized there.
>But I think it would be wrong to deny an archer a new rank simply because
>no one has seen fit to make it official. You shoot it, you deserve it.
>
>ReynePer chevron purpure and vert, two sheaves of arrows and a griffin
>
>
>
> > From: gcjckc at hotmail.com> To: archers at atlantia.sca.org> Date: Sun, 19
>Nov 2006 09:17:49 -0500> Subject: [Archers] Royal Round web site> >
>Greetings all,> > Hopefully now most of the scores have been reinputted
>from the last loss.> > There is another topic I would like to bring up to
>the archers in general > regarding a new development. We now have an archer
>who has broken the 120 > average, and the site's programing kicked in and
>produced a new ranking-- > LUDICROUS Bowmen. At the moment the offical
>rankings does not include this > rank, though in the known SCA world this
>is an unoffical ranking that was > first brought to light by the East
>Kingdom. Let it also be known that the > East Kingdom does not have an
>offical ranking for shooting 120 and over. > There is a web page that lists
>all these people which at the moment there is > 20.> >
>http://www.kellswood.com/ekscores/history-ludicrous.htm> > Now I have made
>my concerns to the Kingdom Archery Marshal (who has shot the > 120+ score)
>and Baron Jonathas Reinisch the programmer, that this is an > unoffical
>ranking and should not be listed on the web site as this ranking, > and if
>we want this ranking listed on the web site we should change the > rules to
>add this ranking, but until then it should be removed......I should > also
>note that the East Kingdom does not list Ludicrous bowman at all on > their
>rankings or on their main scoring web site.> > I would like as many
>archers' thoughts on this subject as possible.> > > In Service to the
>DREAM> THL GREGGE the ARCHER> Atlantian Kingdom Score Keeper> >
>_________________________________________________________________> Talk now
>to your Hotmail contacts with Windows Live Messenger. >
>http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://get.live.com/messenger/overview>
> > _______________________________________________> Archers mailing list>
>Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
>http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/archers
>_________________________________________________________________
>Search from any Web page with powerful protection. Get the FREE Windows
>Live Toolbar Today!
>http://get.live.com/toolbar/overview
_________________________________________________________________
Talk now to your Hotmail contacts with Windows Live Messenger.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0020000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
More information about the Archers
mailing list