[MR] underwear, notl underware

[Jim Looper]

Yes, but the latter is a slip of the finger. The former was a misspelling of the word. So, Murphy's really doesn't come into play on this one...


----- Original Message -----
Yeah, that one made me groan too. But it's also "not" not "notl." Muphry's
law strikes again.

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Richard Mowbray <syrrichard at yahoo.com>wrote:

> Come on, folks. This title reads like some kind of massed produced pottery
> you place under things - platters under whole boars' heads, plates under
> potted plants , etc. It's "underwear"
>