[MR] Fwd: care with accusations Re: Pennsic Water Challenge
morgul at sc.rr.com
morgul at sc.rr.com
Sun Jul 17 10:03:35 PDT 2011
Not that I am aware of. I have not heard of any regulations about it, but I know it is a growing concern. Based on dilution, I'm not sure that its a serious issue, but its definitely one that needs to be studied.
- Lord Cian mac Cellacháin hUí Dublaich
(mka Craig)
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
-----Original Message-----
From: "NH Designs " <nhjewelry at hotmail.com>
Sender: atlantia-bounces at seahorse.atlantia.sca.orgDate: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 15:28:40
To: atlantia at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<atlantia at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
Subject: Re: [MR] Fwd: care with accusations Re: Pennsic Water Challenge
M'Lord,
Are you aware of whether or not any cities have started treating water to remove pharmaceutical residue?
Thanks,
Sigrun
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig <morgul at sc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:32:39
To: <atlantia at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
Subject: Re: [MR] Fwd: care with accusations Re: Pennsic Water Challenge
That sounds more like a conductivity meter rather than turbidity, as
turbidity uses a beam of light passing through the sample to determine
scatter.
However, if it was measuring turbidity, and you read the well water at
400 NTU (not PPM), that's not totally unexpected. Charlotte water at 34
NTU, however, is. That's a violation of EPA regs, which require
drinking water to have a turbidity of less than 1 NTU. Same applies to
bottled water, which incidentally is rarely any better than tap water.
Hopefully the 34 NTU reading was a result of the pipes leading to your
test point, and not the city water itself. Most city municipalities
produce water that is as pure as bottled water, and they are closely
monitored.
Well water, however, isn't that closely checked except for a few
parameters, and could very well be an issue.
-Cian
On 7/17/2011 8:13 AM, Logan wrote:
> its a portable turbidity tester, not for anything specific. two electrodes
> shoot an arch and it tests resistance (if i remember the explanation
> correctly). when my partner and i built our water purification store it was
> a piece of equipment that was suggested by the company that built our
> filtration and storage tanks. we tested charlotte city water before and
> after running it through our equipment. since we ran two reverse osmosis
> filters the water would always be around 1ppm since few things are smaller
> than one micron. gases and fecal coliform were removed via the charcoal i
> guess and bacteria via the uv bath. and something removed the fluoride,
> just dont recall what it was. ;^)
>
> the meter was about 6" long by 1" square if that helps.
>
> regards
> logan
>
>
========================================================================
The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
Submissions: Atlantia at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/atlantia-atlantia.sca.org
========================================================================
The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
Submissions: Atlantia at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/atlantia-atlantia.sca.org
More information about the Atlantia
mailing list