[MR] Crossbow stock rule interpretation

[Stefan li Rous]

Siegfried said:
<<< The decision was made to disallow these obviously modern stocks  
from our
fields.

You are correct, that there are of course 'period rifle stocks'.  But
all versions of them, including the one you posted (Which actually, I
might argue from my documentation is really a 17th century style, I'd
love to see your documentation there) ... Look remarkably different.

Therefore, any 'period crossbow stock'.  OR 'period rifle stock that
happens to have a crossbow prod attached to it' (as we know that
influences were shared) ... are perfectly fine and period.>>>

Thank you for the question and this answer. I believe Ansteorra may  
have a similar rule. Until this, I thought it was Society-wide. I've  
never paid much attention since I had no idea that there were any  
"rifle-style" stocks in period. The example shown of the 16th/17th  
century style also has a rear sight, which I also thought was  
disallowed under SCA rules, but perhaps that is just an Ansteorra rule.

<<< Basically:  "If it looks modern, and smells modern.  It's modern"  
 >>>

I find this a bit too fuzzy. I'd prefer to see something a bit more  
definitive myself.

Stefan

--------
THLord Stefan li Rous    Barony of Bryn Gwlad    Kingdom of Ansteorra
    Mark S. Harris           Austin, Texas          StefanliRous at austin.rr.com
**** See Stefan's Florilegium files at:  http://www.florilegium.org ****