[MR] Peer Requirement Question (Was Re: Marshal Questions

[scribe0002 at aol.com]

Rebecca, 

I'm curious to know the positive benefits you and the others in the conversation felt either requirement would have.

~gise

 

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Becky McEllistrem <bmcellis at yahoo.com>
To: atlantia at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Sent: Wed, Jul 21, 2010 6:18 am
Subject: Re: [MR] Marshal Questions


Here's an interesting follow up question that came up during a group 

conversation online last night.  





Should knights (and perhaps all peers) be required to have associates in order 

for their opinion to be considered valid on a polling?





IE you have no associates?  Then you may discuss candidates for an order but 

your polling is invalid or carries half the weight of the pollings from those 

that do have associates.



Don't know of kingdom or society law would have to change for that to happen 

which is the direction most of the discussion took most of the time.



A side tangent to that was - do you live in kingdom?  No then your polling is 

half the weight of those that do live in kingdom.



Doubt any serious change in this direction would ever happen but it was an 

interesting subject I'd never thought about before.



Rebecca

========================================================================

                   The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside

    List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/

  Submissions: Atlantia at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org

Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/atlantia-atlantia.sca.org