[MR] That was then, this is now

[ldmolly at md.metrocast.net]

A-ha...that's a fair explanation. 

I have another question for the fighters in the tavern (again, I am attempting to learn about the different points of view here):

When fighting in a tournament, at what point do the advantages of one opponent over another start to make a difference? 
Legged, fighting off arm, experience (or lack thereof), many-against-one or...for some, no level of advantage would make the fight so disparate as to require equalization? How do each of you make the determination? 

Thanks for the great dialog, 

Molly



On Wed 09/30/09 12:17 PM , "Wayne Remes" wremes at carolina.rr.com sent:
The differance from my point of view is that while your opponent was
standing usually the Sun to your back is not a factor as it is higher in the
sky than your opponents vision, and should not have been a factor in
wounding or killing him. However, when your opponent is on his/her knees,
the angle of vision has changed and they are looking up more into the sun.
Fighting and making them look into the sun is a trick, infering that you do
not have the needed skill to defeat our opponent without using a really
cheap trick.

Axel