[MR] 4th Peerage

Tracy Janicki aine_rua at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 20 08:51:32 PST 2009


Please beg my pardon for being impudent on this folks.  I have no real feelings either way on the concept of a 4th peerage.  There are points in both directions.  But to actually imply that rapier should not be a  peerage because it's easier, is markedly unjust in my opinion.  There is just as much work effort and time put in by our rapier fighters as there is by our heavy fighters.  Mind you, I fight heavy myself, but still appreciate the amount of dedication they have to their chosen martial art.  They deserve just as much recognition as anyone else.  I also applaud them for the pursuit of  rapier for the love of the art.  The don't have delusions of grandeur going in of becoming knights, where as I have met many a young heavy fighter whose sole ambition was to where a white belt usually fair before he had any idea of what that REALLY meant.  In short, we accept the war points they provide, so they deserve if not recognition in the peerage at least the
 respect of not only the peerage but the populace as well.

My two cents, sorry but it had to be said.




________________________________
From: Hrothgar <thorgrimm at windstream.net>
To: atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:21:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MR] 4th Peerage


>  Everyone should be able to aspire to a
> Peerage someday if that's their wish; to impose limits on a group based
> solely on their choice of fighting (heavy vs. rapier) in unfair.
> Gina MacNeill
> AKA Lady Rhiannon of Berra, CP

This issue seems to come up every couple of years. I agree completely with 
Lady Rhiannon that everyone should aspire to a Peerage. It is truly the 
epitome of all that we do. However, the misplaced idea that new peerages 
should be created for each subgroup in the Society is ridiculous.

If one wishes to become a Knight, then one can follow that path. The same 
holds true for Laurel and Pelican. If someone chooses to go in another 
direction, then that is their decision and they should be happy with that 
choice. They should not feel "cheated" that whatever their microcosm of 
interest is not recognized as a peerage worthy pursuit.

Rapier was only allowed in the SCA as an peripheral activity to begin with. 
Atlantia buying into Ansteorra's White Scarf idea was just an end run around 
the BOD's decision on the matter. People choose rapier because it's easier 
than fighting. The learning curves are vastly different. To view them as 
equal on any level is just wrong. I have no real issue with fencing. If a 
person is unable physically, emotionally, or financially to participate as a 
fighter but want to get a small taste of what it's like to be on the field, 
then rapier is a fine and wonderful thing. But it shouldn't be considered a 
peerage level pursuit.

Sitting astride a rocking horse brandishing a radio antenna about in a 
menacing manner does not equate to a Knight on a warhorse charging into 
battle.

Ever Opinionated,
Hrothgar 

========================================================================
                   The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
    List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
  Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia



      


More information about the Atlantia mailing list