[MR] 4th Peerage
Tracy Janicki
aine_rua at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 20 08:51:32 PST 2009
Please beg my pardon for being impudent on this folks. I have no real feelings either way on the concept of a 4th peerage. There are points in both directions. But to actually imply that rapier should not be a peerage because it's easier, is markedly unjust in my opinion. There is just as much work effort and time put in by our rapier fighters as there is by our heavy fighters. Mind you, I fight heavy myself, but still appreciate the amount of dedication they have to their chosen martial art. They deserve just as much recognition as anyone else. I also applaud them for the pursuit of rapier for the love of the art. The don't have delusions of grandeur going in of becoming knights, where as I have met many a young heavy fighter whose sole ambition was to where a white belt usually fair before he had any idea of what that REALLY meant. In short, we accept the war points they provide, so they deserve if not recognition in the peerage at least the
respect of not only the peerage but the populace as well.
My two cents, sorry but it had to be said.
________________________________
From: Hrothgar <thorgrimm at windstream.net>
To: atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:21:19 AM
Subject: Re: [MR] 4th Peerage
> Everyone should be able to aspire to a
> Peerage someday if that's their wish; to impose limits on a group based
> solely on their choice of fighting (heavy vs. rapier) in unfair.
> Gina MacNeill
> AKA Lady Rhiannon of Berra, CP
This issue seems to come up every couple of years. I agree completely with
Lady Rhiannon that everyone should aspire to a Peerage. It is truly the
epitome of all that we do. However, the misplaced idea that new peerages
should be created for each subgroup in the Society is ridiculous.
If one wishes to become a Knight, then one can follow that path. The same
holds true for Laurel and Pelican. If someone chooses to go in another
direction, then that is their decision and they should be happy with that
choice. They should not feel "cheated" that whatever their microcosm of
interest is not recognized as a peerage worthy pursuit.
Rapier was only allowed in the SCA as an peripheral activity to begin with.
Atlantia buying into Ansteorra's White Scarf idea was just an end run around
the BOD's decision on the matter. People choose rapier because it's easier
than fighting. The learning curves are vastly different. To view them as
equal on any level is just wrong. I have no real issue with fencing. If a
person is unable physically, emotionally, or financially to participate as a
fighter but want to get a small taste of what it's like to be on the field,
then rapier is a fine and wonderful thing. But it shouldn't be considered a
peerage level pursuit.
Sitting astride a rocking horse brandishing a radio antenna about in a
menacing manner does not equate to a Knight on a warhorse charging into
battle.
Ever Opinionated,
Hrothgar
========================================================================
The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia
More information about the Atlantia
mailing list