[MR] Waterbearing proposal comments
TheWolfhou at aol.com
TheWolfhou at aol.com
Tue Jul 1 11:19:10 PDT 2008
Greetings Friends,
I know we are tired of hearing of this issue. But having carefully read the
proposed amendment, and listening to some of the comments on the Merry Rose,
I do not think it will have much bearing on what we do, at least in northern
Atlantia. I don't think we have much "regulated", "official", "warranted" or
"controlled" water bearing activity, at least in my neck of the woods.
Re-read the proposal:
"Proposed language to be added to Corpora:
The activity of providing beverages to combatants and spectators at SCA
Combat activities is not regulated, warranted, organized, controlled, or
sanctioned by the SCA, Inc. or any affiliate or subsidiary entity. All
warrants, authorizations, or other formal recognition of this activity
are by publication of this change revoked. This document does not either
address or restrict such volunteer activity or the methods by which it
occurs."
Where I usually play in northern VA, waterbearing is a service. There are no
guilds or specific water bearing groups that I would consider "official". So,
I don't believe the proposed addition would even be relevent in our area.
Our canton has squeeze bottles, bottle brush for cleaning, and proceedures to
clean them with a bit of bleach added as a disinfectant after events. The
supplies are available for whomever wishes to organize water, gateraide,
pickles, oranges and pretzels to rehydrate fighters, archers, throwers, and
spectators. The person who volunteers to be in charge of the organization of the
service for that Event is called the "Waterbearer" so as to have some form of
designation with an idea of what they are doing and some guidelines of needs.
Shade and sunblocks are also planned for if needed. Gaterade, foods, and water
are Event costs to attempt to prevent dehydration and heat related accidents
for the attendees. Many attendees to Events do not come prepared, and
fighters are not known for remembering to drink during thier playtime. Most of the
fighters remember to squrit water from the bottles rather than sucking the
water. The waterbearing service provided is the Autocrat's attempt to prevent
such preventable accidents. Nobody is forced to partake. It is an offer if so
needed and desired. And in good faith, we try to keep them safe, for we too
partake. Many times I have offered water to be told by a fighter that he has
had a cold and has been drinking from the water bottle he brought. In gerneral,
I find induviduals usually are considerate of others in the matters of not
spreading germs... and there has been much education to get it that way. And I
am running into more fighters and spectators who are wearing camel packs for
thier personal water.
Water born illnesses as a whole are a slight risk when compared to other
risks, and we are making a mountain out of the mole hill. When you question the
possibility of water born illness, do you consider the greater risks of food
born illnesses from feasts, dayboards, hospitality setups and even people
bringing their own food? That is surely a whole new can of worms not opened yet.
Liabilities from injury due to heavy combat, rapier, archery, thrown
weapons, childrens activities, dancing, crafting of arts, site and weather are also
more likely. So, do we not have any Events for fear of suits? I think that
would kill the SCA. Ask yourself, "what is the purpose of the waivers signed
either at an event or for the blue card?" Our activities are planned in good
faith with the attempts to try to keep participants safe, but the induvidual
also has responsibility for thier own safe conduct also. If an induvidual feels
an activity (food or drink included) is unsafe, he or she should refrain
from doing it. Nobody if forcing a person to fight, craft, eat, drink, or even
come to an event or group meeting. There is the measure of personal attendee
responsibility and of good faith that those planning and running an SCA event
are trying to make it safe.
My big concern with the proposed statement is: will it discouage the
education to learn how to be safety conscious when planning Events? Education is
good in promoting good habits. By making the statement that waterbearing is
unofficial, are we discouraging the education of serving safe water? Classes on
serving water safely needs to be addressed (such as cleaning bottles with some
manner of sterilization, not using milk jugs that may have milk residues,
remembering to provide disposable cups beside the orange coolers for those who
have illnesses or have had recent illnesses or have compromised immune
systems and who have forgotten their own cups...). Are we educating how to prevent
the likelyhood of water born illnesses? In Autocrating classes there is often
mention of remembering to provide rehydration for attendees to prevent the
need of chirurgeon service. (Remember, Chirurgeons get excited when they have
cases, but they would really prefer to be bored and not be needed.) Are we,
by this proposed statement, discouraging any mention of waterbearing service
to new autocrates and thus water availability at an Event is forgotten by lack
of education and some unprepared attendee has a major dehydration accident?
These are my thoughts on this propsed statement,
I am yours in service,
Lady Blitha of Wolfhou
Canton of Sudentorre, in the Barony of Stierbach
**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
More information about the Atlantia
mailing list