[MR] Royal Travel Fund

[Logan]

agreed.  like i said, most rules are based on what ifs and may bes.  just
like the elbow cop behind the shield rule.  to date, not a single injury
without an elbow cop.  but ya just never know......

regards
logan


 
 
If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his
vengeance need not be feared.
http://fighterpractice.com
http://ebonwoulfe.com/
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Walter W Triplette [mailto:wtriplette at surry.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:17 PM
To: Logan
Subject: Re: [MR] Royal Travel Fund

yes, your grace, that is probably the thinking behind the rule. it is a 
silly rule, however. a king of atlantia has personal honor, and would 
therefore never take advantage of the travel fund.
our society is based on honor, and those who abuse this concept sooner or 
later are invited to find another hobby.

regards,
rufus
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Logan" <logan at ebonwoulfe.com>
To: <atlantia at atlantia.sca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [MR] Royal Travel Fund


> my suspicion is that it is in fear of that "free trip to australia
> compliments of your friends in atlantia".  most of our rules these days 
> seem
> to focus on the what ifs and could bes and well maybes rather than to
> address actual transgressions.  but that is my guess.
>
> regards
> logan
>
>
>
> If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his
> vengeance need not be feared.
> http://fighterpractice.com
> http://ebonwoulfe.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org
> [mailto:atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org] On Behalf Of Alan MacNeill
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 12:11 PM
> To: atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
> Subject: Re: [MR] Royal Travel Fund
>
> I do not mean to seem dense here...but what is the rationale for
> compeltely restricting the initial deposit for in-Kingdom travel only?
>
> To a large degree, this seems like a problem that could be easily
> solved with a removal of about 5 words in the policy.  Alternatively,
> some sort of "a maximum of X will be reimbursed for out of kingdom
> travel" or some such if there was a concern about a King and Queen
> spending their cash on only out of Kingdom events.
>
> I'm confused.  Please enlighten me.
>
> Gorm of Berra
>
> On 5/2/07, padrgroups at charter.net <padrgroups at charter.net> wrote:
>> While the amount of money in the travel fund has been raised
> significantly,
>> it is now restricted to use for in-Kingdom travel. Only donations to the
>> fund may be used for out-of-kingdom travel. What this means is that the
>> events farthest away, and most expensive to travel to, cannot be
> reimbursed
>> from the travel fund unless additional monies are raised.
> ========================================================================
>                   The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
>    List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
>  Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
> Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia
>
> ========================================================================
>                   The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
>    List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
>  Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
> Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia