[MR] Royal Travel Fund

[Logan]

my suspicion is that it is in fear of that "free trip to australia
compliments of your friends in atlantia".  most of our rules these days seem
to focus on the what ifs and could bes and well maybes rather than to
address actual transgressions.  but that is my guess.

regards
logan

 
 
If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his
vengeance need not be feared.
http://fighterpractice.com
http://ebonwoulfe.com/
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org
[mailto:atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org] On Behalf Of Alan MacNeill
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 12:11 PM
To: atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subject: Re: [MR] Royal Travel Fund

I do not mean to seem dense here...but what is the rationale for
compeltely restricting the initial deposit for in-Kingdom travel only?

To a large degree, this seems like a problem that could be easily
solved with a removal of about 5 words in the policy.  Alternatively,
some sort of "a maximum of X will be reimbursed for out of kingdom
travel" or some such if there was a concern about a King and Queen
spending their cash on only out of Kingdom events.

I'm confused.  Please enlighten me.

Gorm of Berra

On 5/2/07, padrgroups at charter.net <padrgroups at charter.net> wrote:
> While the amount of money in the travel fund has been raised
significantly,
> it is now restricted to use for in-Kingdom travel. Only donations to the
> fund may be used for out-of-kingdom travel. What this means is that the
> events farthest away, and most expensive to travel to, cannot be
reimbursed
> from the travel fund unless additional monies are raised.
========================================================================
                   The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
    List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
  Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia