[MR] Fwd: Re: A&S Sponsors for non-A&S people

[Logan]

i was not trying to diminish the work required to be a competent mic.  but
to be honest its terribly easy work.  now dealing with kids running around
going crazy is a slightly different story.  of course for me its like a trip
to the fresh market being that im a baby eater and all that.  >8^D

regards
logan

 
http://fighterpractice.com
http://ebonwoulfe.com/
http://atheistdelusion.cf.huffingtonpost.com/
 
support the removal of stupidity:
http://ebonwoulfe.com/elbow.htm
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org
[mailto:atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org] On Behalf Of Tracie Ellis
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 6:22 PM
Cc: Atlantia
Subject: Re: [MR] Fwd: Re: A&S Sponsors for non-A&S people

My tuppence on this thought - It seems to me that watching a single
fighter's child whilst single fighter helps the Kingdom Army defeat the
'baddies' of the week (sorry, being silly there) is more of a
service...keeps said child out from underfoot and engaged away from the
field (and thus away from harm).

Not that MIC-ing is any less a service....I think any head staff position is
worthy of a bottle of Tylenol at times.

Miriel

On 3/1/07, Logan <logan at ebonwoulfe.com> wrote:
>
> you mis-understood.  what i said was that the act of watching a single
> parents child so they could fight or making food for them is certainly
> equal
> to the work of a water bearer or the mic.  what would be a weak argument
> would have been for someone to suggest that those actions are equal simply
> because they serve the army.  i think caring for the children is a much
> more
> taxing responsibility than being an mic.  ive done both and, well, one
> wasn't any real work at all.  yet there are those that would suggest that
> my
> work as mic was a better service than my work with children simply because
> one served the fighting community and the other didn't.
>
> hope you understand now.
>
> regards
> logan
>