[MR] Speaking Forsoothly ... was: Re: Were "Smalls" Children or "unmentionables"?

[Logan]

it might be somewhat period in some cases in some locations in some segments
of history.  but it is certainly terribly damaging to the way society views
us.  

regards
logan
 
http://ebonwoulfe.com/
http://atheistdelusion.cf.huffingtonpost.com/
 
support the removal of stupidity:
http://ebonwoulfe.com/elbow.htm

-----Original Message-----
From: atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org
[mailto:atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org] On Behalf Of Siegfried
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:43 PM
To: Steven Chang
Cc: atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subject: Re: [MR] Speaking Forsoothly ... was: Re: Were "Smalls" Children or
"unmentionables"?

> There are no such things as dragons in this reality, so calling them 
> dragons is a bit of fancy all of itself. We're all supposed to be period 
> correct in every aspect of this anachronistic world.

Correct; however, in period, they did believe that dragons existed. 
(Depending upon your exact period and locality).  Therefore talking 
about dragons, and perhaps believing one sees a dragon, or not wanting 
to go to the place that the dragons live (parking lot) ...

Can actually be rather period.

Siegfried
========================================================================
                   The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
    List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
  Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia