[MR] Re: hmmmmm

[G.M. Miller]

Phillip:
    I think you will find that this law is an archaic entry, which was originally intended to make the KKK, which everyone knows to have been a violent and racist organization, uncomfortable.
    The KKK wore white robes with pointed hoods for two major reasons. One was to invoke terror. The second, and most important for their members was to maintain anonymity. Oftentimes, as you can see in any good US History book, the KKK was involved in murders, destruction of property, as well as other violent crimes. The masks allowed the KKK to do these things without having witnesses to who actually perpertrated them.
    Hence came the law you have quoted.
    Since the formation of a club or fraternity is not illegal in North Carolina, (hence the Masonic Lodge, Moose Lodge, VFW, etc.) this law required that the members of the KKK attend thir meetings, and activities, without their masks. This not only allowed them to be identified for lawful prosecution, but also allowed non-supporters and victims to identify the people involved (for retribution possibly).
    This law is only rarely actually used by modern day law enforcement. Usually only in dealing with the last bastions of violent masked groups (KKK, Taliban, etc).
    Basically this is a moot point, simply because the "demonstration" mentioned in the law is for protests, and demonstrations such as marching against an abortion clinic, or burning a cross in your neighbors yard. It does not include demonstrations of an artform or of a gaming or recreational nature.
    This law has no bearing on the SCA or any other similar group. You can even still play cowboys and Indians while wearing a bandana over your face if you so wish!
    Hope this sheds some light on the subject for you.

Gavius Allectus of Alexandria