[MR] Is the Acorn the reason you're a member?
Morvyth verch Morgan
morvyth_verch_morgan at cox.net
Sun Dec 19 14:36:10 PST 2004
And the answer to that is (in my case), no way! The Acorn alone is not
worth the cost of membership.
My Acorn (I pay for first class) gets here far later than I think is
appropriate (I still don't have the December issue). I've complained
to the Post Office, but my mail carrier is (to be polite), an ass with
an attitude who also REGULARLY misdelivers mail within my townhouse
cluster and along his entire route. (Yes, there are complaints against
him, and as prez of the townhouse cluster, I'm trying to get the local
postmaster to get off their duff and DO something about this...so far,
to no avail. Oh and this week alone I've had two packages in my
mailbox that aren't for me and whose addresses don't even remotely
resemble mine, just to give an example of how bad mail service CAN
be.....).
So if the Acorn WERE the reason I joined, I'd be sadly disappointed.
Whether its the fault of the SCA or the US government, snail mail in
the Washington DC area is no longer timely and I don't count on it if
there is a deadline. I used FedEx or UPS... or rely on couriers.
While I do have a permanent mailing address, I'd be a MUCH happier
camper if the Acorn were available electronically (PDF) for download at
the time the issue was mailed to those who want/need snail mail. I'd
HAPPILY give up the paper copy... it's one less thing to shred/recycle.
Yes, I know there is the matter of SCA policy. SCA policy needs to be
revisted in these times of less reliability of snail mail and more
caution/security/paranoia which causes it (and allows lazy slackers to
get away with bloody murder while "working" for the Post Office, but I
digress....).
I'm all for RSS feeds.... as soon as they're available, I'm there. I'm
even more for making electronic versions of all documentation
available... as soon as they're legal, I'm there.
~Morvyth
On Dec 18, 2004, at 1:42 AM, atlantia-request at atlantia.sca.org wrote:
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 01:00:35 -0500
> From: Joshua Thomas <joshua.r.thomas at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [MR] In revieww
> To: deepfatfriar at mindspring.com, atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
> Message-ID: <380f9a790412172200156eda1c at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
>>
>> The Kingdom Chronicler and all webministers involved are doing the
>> best possible job they can given the nature of applicable law and
>> policy, and the exigencies of their mundane lives. (Good on 'em.)
>>
>
> Actually, the Kingdom Policy is the hold up. The society policy says
> you can't transmit the "Acorn" by electronics means. The
> interpretation seems to be as a whole, as we and many kingdom's
> transmit parts electronically. This does not mean we can't web the
> letters earlier, if the Kingdom Policy were to be changed. I am
> curious who really joined because of the Acorn since it is
> overshadowed by more real benifits. (pay to play, fighting, the
> surcharge) Do we really gain a more significant membership growth
> through handicapping our information flows? (slowing the flows down to
> snail mail speed) Thats what we should be asking here.
More information about the Atlantia
mailing list