[MR] RE: The Queens Arms

[Richard Fitzgilbert]

Greetings from Richard!

I think there's something missing from the statement below.  It certainly seems,
to me, patently incorrect.  For, I certainly construe this lack of response as
support.  Very tepid support, but support none the less.  Is this meant to say
that it will not be construed by the corporate entities as support?  That may
well be, but those corporate entities are not the only ones interested in
evaluating the lack of response.  If someone, say the Queen, decided to construe
a lack of written polling response as support, that would clearly point out the
mistakes in the below statement.

Yours in Service to Atlantia,
Richard Fitzgilbert



-----Original Message-----
From: atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org
[mailto:atlantia-bounces at atlantia.sca.org] On Behalf Of Michael Houghton

Groups are required to demonstrate affirmative support for changes to their
names and arms. That is clearly stated in the governing documents. A lack of
response can not and will not be construed as support. 

yours,
Herveus
-- 
Michael and MJ Houghton   | Herveus d'Ormonde and Megan O'Donnelly
herveus at radix.net         | White Wolf and the Phoenix
Bowie, MD, USA            | Tablet and Inkle bands, and other stuff
                          | http://www.radix.net/~herveus/
========================================================================
                   The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
    List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
  Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia