[MR] RE: The Queens Arms

[Nicholas S. Malone]

Actually I think the populace has spoken quite clearly.  It does not 
care. This is not an issue that justifies an e-mail response to Laurel 
let alone a stamp and mail. In all reality this is an issue that only 
matters to a VERY few. I think campaigning has already drummed up more 
responses than would have been made by choice! The polling very 
accurately reflects the feelings of the crowd.  This is a lot like the 
Anderson for president campaign; A neat idea but who cares and what 
difference will it make to more than a dozen people.

David Wendelken wrote:

>>But that last clause is EXACTLY why the latest proposal to change 
>>the Queen's arms was returned by the Laurel 
>>Sovereigns of Arms!  Atlantia did not 'think well of it', 
>>but as a whole shrugged and said "Eh. Not important.  
>>Not gonna bother."  There is no way that any reasonable person can 
>>interpret a response of less than 5 percent as 
>>being "well thought of in the kingdom".
> 
> 
> The maxim of the law is this:  "Silence implies consent."
> 
> 95% of those polled gave their consent to the change by their silence.
> 
> Andras
> 
> 
> ========================================================================
>                    The Merry Rose Tavern at Cheapside
>     List Info: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
>   Submissions: Atlantia at atlantia.sca.org
> Subscriptions: http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/atlantia
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> 
> 
> 

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]