[MR] NonMember Charges

[Brett W. McCoy]

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Logan wrote:

> im not sure why anyone would have a problem with non-members paying a little
> bit to defer the costs that the society as a whole incurs due, in part, to
> their attendance at events while they contribute nothing.  this only makes
> the cost to "play" somewhat even across the boards.  if a person goes to
> fewer than 12 events a year they save money, more and they should just buy a
> membership.  most organizations require memberships to belong to them and
> the sca should be no different.

I don't have an issue with it myself, but having the member discount AND
the non-member surcharge could lead to more confusion and logistics than I
like to think about.

                                          http://www.chapelperilous.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right.
		-- Salvor Hardin, "Foundation"