<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Your Majesty,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Thank you for expressing in a “Royal manner” what I have thought for many years. Specifically, awards given in “order” and awards NOT handed out like candy at Halloween. (I may have expressed those thoughts a bit rougher than you did.) But your post also brings up an excellent point. As was posted here on this list, having your definition of an award for which you were an integral part of forming was of great value to us all and settled some discussions we have had. Thus the idea springs into my otherwise empty head, perhaps it would be a good idea if the Royals were to give a class at University explaining their criteria for awards. Not every University, but occasionally. It is frustrating those of us not in the position of a Royal to make recommendations for awards and see them, seemingly, go ignored when, in fact, they were not acted upon because our perception of the award is not in agreement with the Royal who would have given the award. I’m not thinking of going through each and every award but rather what is the criteria a Royal would expect of an individual who they would award a merit award to or award of high merit. I believe this would help all the Orders and recommendations for awards in that we could look at our recommendation and measure them against the Royal perception of what would be required/expected of an individual awarded such.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>With due respect and looking forward to seeing you on the archery range,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Christophe of Grey<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> thdonadio@gmail.com [mailto:thdonadio@gmail.com] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Padraigin O'hEachach<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:52 AM<br><b>To:</b> John Atkins<br><b>Cc:</b> archers@atlantia.sca.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Archers] Recommendation<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Good morning,<br><br>To address the specific topic at hand, Lord Alester MacClansy (which is how his name appears in the Order of Precedence) was awarded an Opal at Fall Crown Tournament.<br><br>But since I'm here, I hope you will allow me to share some thoughts with you about awards. All Orders of Merit (KM, Sea Dragon, Coral Branch, etc) were written with the intent that they be for effort, not necessarily skill. I was the Queen that wrote them into law, so really, I know this. Skill is an added bonus, but the purpose was to recognize people who are consistently trying and making some impact, somewhere, somehow. Royal Rounds can also be hard to come by if you live further away from a local group. They are not often done at events, and not everyone has a local practice to attend. Orders of High Merit, on the other hand, generally require a much higher level of skill and dedication to a particular discipline. <br><br>The single best part of being royalty is the ability to recognize worthy subjects. Being able to see the person's face when you give them an award is an amazing high. It makes your heart full to read about all of the good things people are doing around the kingdom to support the hobby you love.<br><br>However, I have noticed two trends that I find troubling in award recommendations, but I suspect that both stem from a fundamental lack of knowledge about our awards system in general, and our awards within the greater context of the SCA.<br><br>First trend: recommending someone for an Order of Merit as a first award. While there is no requirement that a person have X before they can receive Y, the generally accepted practice across the SCA is that the Award of Arms is the first award someone receives. Many people played in the SCA for several years (3-4 for me) before receiving an AoA. A good rule of thumb for most royalty is that the person has been around for at least a year AND consistently contributing to something during that time.<br><br>Second trend: recommending people for awards who have received awards fairly recently. SCA awards are not merit badges, and should not be approached as something to check off a list. Doing what you enjoy, because you enjoy it, is the surest way to gain satisfaction from it. Everyone wants to see their friends recognized, and recommendations are vital to making that happen. But before making a recommendation, please consider the following:<br><br>1. Check the OP to see if that person already has the award you are recommending, keeping in mind that you should check alternate spellings.<br>2. Understand that Orders of Merit carry an AoA with them if the person does not already have one. So if you see that someone has a Coral Branch, then by default, he also has an AoA. The same is true for Orders of High Merit (Golden Dolphin, Yew Bow) and GoAs.<br>3. Check when the person last received a kingdom award. If it was within the last year, consider whether that person really needs another award so soon. Most royalty are hesitant to make awards to people recently recognized.<br>4. Update the recommendations you make. If you made a recommendation during the last reign that has not been acted upon, go back into the recommendation and update it as appropriate.<br>5. Keep in mind that Orders of High Merit and Peerages must be polled by Their Royal Majesties. This process takes time. If you recommend someone today for a Yew Bow, it will not be awarded this weekend, and probably not even this month. <br><br>Also keep in mind that you can recommend people for Baronial awards. I have found that most people are simply happy to be noticed. Something as simple, but personal, as a token and a moment of thanks, especially in a public place, can have an incredible impact. Lady Lorelei's archery tokens are an excellent example. The SCA can be a life-long pursuit. I've been doing this for 17 years, and many of you have been doing it even longer. I'm looking forward to spending more time shooting very soon.<br><br>Warmest Regards,<br>Padraigin Regina<br><br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:07 AM, John Atkins <<a href="mailto:cogworks@triad.rr.com" target="_blank">cogworks@triad.rr.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#1F497D'>Janyn brings up and interesting point. The first induction I witnessed into the Order of the Yewbow was at a Kingdom Champion Shoot. I went up to the individual after court and congratulated him. His response was “it certainly wasn’t for my shooting, probably for my promotion and service to the archery community”. So Janyn’s point of a displayed proficiency with bow versus service to the archery community becomes the question.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#1F497D'>From the Atlantian list of awards, for the Missilier “</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";background:white'>Honors and recognizes those subjects who have distinguished themselves by their effort with bow and arrow</span><span style='color:#1F497D'> “. That would mean to me that Janyn’s comment is valid. What then would be the “proper” award for an individual who has performed great service to the Atlantian archery community, which I know firsthand and believe this individual has done? Again from the Atlantian award site “</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";background:white'>Honors and recognizes those subjects of the Kingdom who have distinguished themselves by their service to Atlantia.</span><span style='color:#1F497D'> “, for the Opal.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#1F497D'>So would not an Opal be more appropriate in absence of a certain level of expertise as evidenced by a Royal Round award/score?</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#1F497D'>Just my two cents worth,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:#1F497D'>C</span><span style='font-family:Wingdings;color:#1F497D'>J</span><span style='color:#1F497D'>g</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>_______________________________________________<br>Archers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org" target="_blank">Archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org</a><br><a href="http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org" target="_blank">http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>