<html><head>
<link media="all" type="text/css" href="/netmail/static/deg/css/wysiwyg-3933289048.css" rel="stylesheet">
</head><body>
Looking forward to seeing everyone at SAAD I should be there around noon on Friday. I found a neat little road down that should be rather enjoyable on the bike.<br><br>Colum<br><br><br>Apr 26, 2011 02:03:06 PM, archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 3px solid rgb(102, 153, 204);">Send Archers mailing list submissions to<br> archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org<br><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br> archers-request@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> archers-owner@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of Archers digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. yea! (Holly Gibbons)<br> 2. Re: (no subject) (Jim Bishop II)<br> 3. ok Peeps... (Doug Munitz)<br> 4. Re: ok Peeps... (Jonathas)<br> 5. Re: [MR] Crossbow stock rule interpretation (Garth G. Groff)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:29:02 -0700 (PDT)<br>From: Holly Gibbons <holly0920@yahoo.com><br>To: archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br>Subject: [Archers] yea!<br>Message-ID: <992915.52425.qm@web111616.mail.gq1.yahoo.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Found a ride and going to SAAD! Yea! Nuala<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <http: seahorse.atlantia.sca.org="" pipermail="" archers-atlantia.sca.org="" attachments="" 20110425="" e230a233="" attachment.html=""><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:28:59 +0000<br>From: Jim Bishop II <catmajick@hotmail.com><br>To: <gryphon@carolina.rr.com>, <mandy241@hotmail.co.uk>,<br> <sealight23@yahoo.com>, <hwkwdsnschl@hotmail.com>,<br> <marshalls@atlantia.sca.org>, <archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>,<br> <eoganog@aol.com><br>Subject: Re: [Archers] (no subject)<br>Message-ID: <col112-w39ca750798cd443b1bbbdbe990@phx.gbl><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Effective way to stop smoking!. http://csr-cam.com/friends_links.php?oSID=59ah0<br> <br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <http: seahorse.atlantia.sca.org="" pipermail="" archers-atlantia.sca.org="" attachments="" 20110426="" 6fc486f1="" attachment-0001.htm=""><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 3<br>Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:21:44 -0400<br>From: Doug Munitz <mermaids30@comcast.net><br>To: Archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br>Subject: [Archers] ok Peeps...<br>Message-ID: <d72f5ee5-d6cc-48a1-abc7-a44d9cbc3639@comcast.net><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes<br><br>All right guys, time to run the spyware/addware or run norton or <br>something. to many email spams getting onto the lists!!<br><br><br>Sven<br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:29:07 -0400<br>From: Jonathas <jonathas@redfoxden.org><br>To: mermaids30@comcast.net, Archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br>Subject: Re: [Archers] ok Peeps...<br>Message-ID: <banlktindxt7eqea6dsf6sgj5rkv7kt17gw@mail.gmail.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>>From info on the WebMinisters List, from what we can tell the individuals<br>who *appear* to be spamming the lists are not at fault. That is to say of<br>the couple computers that were checked are not infected with either<br>spyware/addware/malware. Rather it appears that the individual email<br>addresses are being cloned by an outside server. This is something that is<br>very easy to do, and the person who receives it can not easily tell if the<br>sender was a bot or a person.<br><br>This is a problem across all the Kingdom lists, and solutions are being<br>sought.<br><br>Jonathas<br><br><br>On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Doug Munitz <mermaids30@comcast.net>wrote:<br><br>> All right guys, time to run the spyware/addware or run norton or something.<br>> to many email spams getting onto the lists!!<br>><br>><br>> Sven<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Archers mailing list<br>> Archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br>> http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org<br>><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <http: seahorse.atlantia.sca.org="" pipermail="" archers-atlantia.sca.org="" attachments="" 20110426="" a65a8b0b="" attachment-0001.htm=""><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 5<br>Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:51:46 -0400<br>From: "Garth G. Groff" <ggg9y@virginia.edu><br>To: Archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br>Subject: Re: [Archers] [MR] Crossbow stock rule interpretation<br>Message-ID: <4DB71442.6010203@virginia.edu><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>Lord Stefan, Greetings.<br><br>Yes, it is a Society-level rule: "Simple rear sights are allowed. Front <br>sights are not allowed." You find it under "Equipment <br>Standards/Crossbows" at: <br>http://www.sca.org/officers/marshal/docs/t_archery/target_archery_rules.pdf <br>.<br><br>In the case of this crossbow, the front sight would have to be removed. <br>One assumes it is probably screwed or bolted in place. Too bad if this <br>crossbow is an accurate model of an original from our period that was <br>made with two sights, but those are the rules.<br><br>Kind regards,<br><br><br>Lord Mungo Napier, Archer of Mallard Lodge<br><br>On 4/26/2011 1:42 PM, Stefan li Rous wrote:<br>> Siegfried said:<br>> <<< The decision was made to disallow these obviously modern stocks <br>> from our<br>> fields.<br>><br>> You are correct, that there are of course 'period rifle stocks'. But<br>> all versions of them, including the one you posted (Which actually, I<br>> might argue from my documentation is really a 17th century style, I'd<br>> love to see your documentation there) ... Look remarkably different.<br>><br>> Therefore, any 'period crossbow stock'. OR 'period rifle stock that<br>> happens to have a crossbow prod attached to it' (as we know that<br>> influences were shared) ... are perfectly fine and period.>>><br>><br>> Thank you for the question and this answer. I believe Ansteorra may <br>> have a similar rule. Until this, I thought it was Society-wide. I've <br>> never paid much attention since I had no idea that there were any <br>> "rifle-style" stocks in period. The example shown of the 16th/17th <br>> century style also has a rear sight, which I also thought was <br>> disallowed under SCA rules, but perhaps that is just an Ansteorra rule.<br>><br>> <<< Basically: "If it looks modern, and smells modern. It's modern" >>><br>><br>> I find this a bit too fuzzy. I'd prefer to see something a bit more <br>> definitive myself.<br>><br>> Stefan<br>><br>> --------<br>> THLord Stefan li Rous Barony of Bryn Gwlad Kingdom of Ansteorra<br>> Mark S. Harris Austin, Texas <br>> StefanliRous@austin.rr.com<br>> **** See Stefan's Florilegium files at: http://www.florilegium.org ****<br>><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Archers mailing list<br>Archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org<br>http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org<br><br><br>End of Archers Digest, Vol 91, Issue 31<br>***************************************<br></ggg9y@virginia.edu></http:></mermaids30@comcast.net></banlktindxt7eqea6dsf6sgj5rkv7kt17gw@mail.gmail.com></jonathas@redfoxden.org></d72f5ee5-d6cc-48a1-abc7-a44d9cbc3639@comcast.net></mermaids30@comcast.net></http:></col112-w39ca750798cd443b1bbbdbe990@phx.gbl></eoganog@aol.com></archers@seahorse.atlantia.sca.org></marshalls@atlantia.sca.org></hwkwdsnschl@hotmail.com></sealight23@yahoo.com></mandy241@hotmail.co.uk></gryphon@carolina.rr.com></catmajick@hotmail.com></http:></holly0920@yahoo.com></blockquote></body></html>