[Archers] ATLatl rules

[Robyn Becker]

I agree with Cog.  This IS a trial run, solets not start tweaking things before we even get scores submitted.  I think we should leave things as they are now, and if we need to change the rankings, we can.  but lets see what kind of scores we get back first.
Reyne

From: cogworks at triad.rr.com
To: jaynardone at comcast.net; archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:02:09 -0400
Subject: Re: [Archers] ATLatl rules

I’m thinking let’s just collect some scores for a bit then see how they are coming in.  I seem to recall “in the old days” many Atlantian archers never thought anyone would ever make it to Grand Bowman much less GBE.  And now we have some at Ludicrous! cog From: archers-bounces at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org [mailto:archers-bounces at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org] On Behalf Of Jay Nardone
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 5:56 PM
To: 'archers'
Subject: [Archers] ATLatl rules Good evening everyone, just one last point I want to clear up on the rules. Since we adopted the 10 – 1 scoring, would we want to double the ranking requirements for each rank to match? So instead of 0-20 as Thrower, it would be 0-40, Huntsman would be 41- 80, etc. We never defined this in the discussion. What do you all think? Janyn 
_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20130905/8aacf625/attachment-0003.htm>