[Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins and Bamboo Shafts

Tue Mar 15 11:57:48 PDT 2011

Greetings fellow archers,
I must admit I would prefer not to have my targets torn up by those tips. They would do an awful amount of damage.
I firmly believe they should be left at being decorative and nothing more.

Also is the use of bamboo shafts allowed? 

3Rivers is also offering them now and the question was posed to Lord Alric.
Personally I would feel that with bamboo being hallow it would pose a greater risk of shattering/splintering.
Not to mention bamboo would take a lot more upkeep such as needing to be oiled every so often.
Figured I'd pose the question here as I've not tried using bamboo and don't know all that much about it.

Does anyone have experience with bamboo? 

Lady Magdalen Woderose

Life is what it is, so do what needs to be done and promptly move on.
Per bend sinister purpure and argent, in bend two unicorns rampant and in bend sinister two roses all counterchanged.

________________________________
From: "archers-request at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org" <archers-request at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
To: archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 1:19 PM
Subject: Archers Digest, Vol 90, Issue 8

Send Archers mailing list submissions to
    archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    archers-request at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    archers-owner at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Archers digest..."

Today's Topics:

  1. Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins (Garth G. Groff)
   2. Re: Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins (loreleielkins at aol.com)
   3. Re: Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins (Garth G. Groff)
   4. Re: Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins (loreleielkins at aol.com)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:44:38 -0400
From: "Garth G. Groff" <ggg9y at virginia.edu>
To: Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Subject: [Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins
Message-ID: <4D7F8966.3050009 at virginia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Noble friends of the bow,

The question was raised in my recent TA Marshal class about the legality 
of the 3Rivers large bodkins. These are very large, and look like they 
might do a lot of damage to a target. Does anyone have any views on 
these, vis-vis the Society rule against broadheads because of their 
potential to rip up a target?

Kind regards,

Lord Mungo Napier, Shire of Isenfir Target Archery Marshal

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:48:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: loreleielkins at aol.com
To: ggg9y at virginia.edu, Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Subject: Re: [Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins
Message-ID: <8CDB13F803558C5-1260-A30B at webmail-m069.sysops.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Greetings!  Yes, you nailed it.  Target points should be used on archery targets.  Target backs can be expensive.  Broadheads are meant to penetrate flesh, not foam.  :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Garth G. Groff <ggg9y at virginia.edu>
To: Archers <Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2011 7:45 am
Subject: [Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins

Noble friends of the bow,Lorelei

The question was raised in my recent TA Marshal class about the legality 
of the 3Rivers large bodkins. These are very large, and look like they 
might do a lot of damage to a target. Does anyone have any views on 
these, vis-vis the Society rule against broadheads because of their 
potential to rip up a target?

Kind regards,

Lord Mungo Napier, Shire of Isenfir Target Archery Marshal
_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20110315/b27f19ef/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:15:08 -0400
From: "Garth G. Groff" <ggg9y at virginia.edu>
To: Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Subject: Re: [Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins
Message-ID: <4D7F908C.2040907 at virginia.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"

Lady Lorelei and friends,

But these are not broadheads, just big bodkins, actually weighing about 
180 grains and about 3/8" across. Some archers might think they are 
legal because they AREN'T broadheads. If somebody shows up with these on 
our range, I am going to take a literal interpretation of the Society 
rule: "No broadheads or tips that cause excessive damage to the targets 
shall be used ...."  3Rivers also sells a smaller version at about 140 
grains which I haven't measured. I think the damage potential would be 
similar.

If anyone just has to shoot traditional arrows, they can still use the 
125-grain Ace faux medieval points or the equivalent that 3Rivers and 
some English vendors offer (so-called "mod-bods"). These have always 
been legal in Atlantia, AFAIK. I can't see why anybody would want to 
shoot such heavy points with our light target bows anyway. Their arrows 
would drop like a stone.

Too bad in a way, because those big bodkins are really cool points. I 
have them on my 3/8" living history arrows, but those shafts are only 
for display and looking cool in my quiver at demonstrations.

Kind regards,

Lord Mungo, Shire of Isenfir TA Marshal

On 3/15/2011 11:48 AM, loreleielkins at aol.com wrote:
> Greetings!  Yes, you nailed it.  Target points should be used on 
> archery targets.  Target backs can be expensive.  Broadheads are meant 
> to penetrate flesh, not foam.  :-)
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Garth G. Groff <ggg9y at virginia.edu>
> To: Archers <Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
> Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2011 7:45 am
> Subject: [Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins
>
> Noble friends of the bow,Lorelei
>
> The question was raised in my recent TA Marshal class about the legality
> of the 3Rivers large bodkins. These are very large, and look like they
> might do a lot of damage to a target. Does anyone have any views on
> these, vis-vis the Society rule against broadheads because of their
> potential to rip up a target?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Lord Mungo Napier, Shire of Isenfir Target Archery Marshal
> _______________________________________________
> Archers mailing list
> Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org  <mailto:Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
> http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20110315/fa1cc3a6/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:05:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: loreleielkins at aol.com
To: ggg9y at virginia.edu, Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Subject: Re: [Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins
Message-ID: <8CDB14A5E487FB8-CA40-13D5 at TSTMAIL-D09.sysops.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

My mistake Lord Mungo.  I read your message too quickly, I apologize. 

I know the points you are talking about and they do indeed damage the targets.  This might be one of those, "at the discretion of the MiC", since it is more than likely the MiC's targets which are being shot up.  While I agree that they are nice for the period look, I wouldn't encourage their use, just because they can potentially cause so much damage.  Now if we had some nice period targets to shoot at.....

Anyone else have thoughts on this?

Lorelei

-----Original Message-----
From: Garth G. Groff <ggg9y at virginia.edu>
To: Archers <Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2011 8:15 am
Subject: Re: [Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins

              Lady Lorelei and friends,

    But these are not broadheads, just big bodkins, actually weighing    about 180 grains and about 3/8" across. Some archers might think    they are legal because they AREN'T broadheads. If somebody shows up    with these on our range, I am going to take a literal interpretation    of the Society rule: "No broadheads or tips that cause excessive    damage to the targets shall be used ...."  3Rivers also sells a    smaller version at about 140 grains which I haven't measured. I    think the damage potential would be similar.

    If anyone just has to shoot traditional arrows, they can still use    the 125-grain Ace faux medieval points or the equivalent that    3Rivers and some English vendors offer (so-called "mod-bods"). These    have always been legal in Atlantia, AFAIK. I can't see why anybody    would want to shoot such heavy points with our light target bows    anyway. Their arrows would drop like a stone.

    Too bad in a way, because those big bodkins are really cool points.    I have them on my 3/8" living history arrows, but those shafts are    only for display and looking cool in my quiver at demonstrations.

    Kind regards,

    Lord Mungo, Shire of Isenfir TA Marshal

    On 3/15/2011 11:48 AM, loreleielkins at aol.com wrote:    
Greetings!  Yes, you          nailed it.  Target points should be used on archery targets.           Target backs can be expensive.  Broadheads are meant to          penetrate flesh, not foam.  :-)        

-----Original              Message-----
            From:              Garth G. Groff <ggg9y at virginia.edu>
            To:              Archers <Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
            Sent:              Tue, Mar 15, 2011 7:45 am
            Subject:              [Archers] Legality of 3Rivers large bodkins

Noble friends of the bow,Lorelei

The question was raised in my recent TA Marshal class about the legality 
of the 3Rivers large bodkins. These are very large, and look like they 
might do a lot of damage to a target. Does anyone have any views on 
these, vis-vis the Society rule against broadheads because of their 
potential to rip up a target?

Kind regards,

Lord Mungo Napier, Shire of Isenfir Target Archery Marshal
_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org

_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20110315/9f8d0f80/attachment.htm>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org

End of Archers Digest, Vol 90, Issue 8
**************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20110315/8b8eee4e/attachment-0002.htm>