[Archers] Fw: Stierbach indoor archery practice and is new rule correctly numbered?

[Kynnyth Pyke]

My apologies for not being clear.  If we settle on the wording:

"A safety zone is defined as an area where the marshal and shooters have sufficient visibility to control and manage the safety of the range."


Then it is up to you to apply that wording to the situation.  It is part of range construction.  If you have something that is big enough to rope off, etc..., per the new rules, but you do not have sufficient visibility to control the zone, then the range is not legal.  If you think it is safe, then you can discuss a waiver with the DEM-TA.

Kynny



________________________________
From: Charles Oliff <caergarchery at gmail.com>
To: Kynnyth Pyke <scacynwrig at yahoo.com>
Cc: Kingdom Archery List <archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
Sent: Mon, March 8, 2010 11:22:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Archers] Fw: Stierbach indoor archery practice and is new rule  correctly numbered?


Unfortunately, you didn't answer the question: Is it my judgement call as MIC on site, or do I need a waiver regardless of my judgement?

and I resent the implication that I would take convenience over safety.

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Kynnyth Pyke <scacynwrig at yahoo.com> wrote:

 I understand your hesitation as we've removed some of the prerogative of the MIC-Target Archery by requiring a waiver.  In all other cases, your judgement is what we use.  It is indeed a judgement call.  You have to be willing to back your decision that there was sufficient visibility.  I have in the recent past and will in the future hold marshals accountable for their judgement.
>
>
>Make sure you are thinking about safety and not just convenience.
>
>K
>
>
>
________________________________
 From: Charles Oliff <caergarchery at gmail.com>
>To: Kingdom Archery List <archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
>Sent: Mon, March 8, 2010 10:40:04 AM
>Subject: Re: [Archers] Fw: Stierbach indoor archery practice and is new rule correctly numbered?
> 
>
>
>does this safety zone definition mean that we can't have part of our safety zone go into woods?
> 
>The way it is worded, I read this as it being a mic judgement call, but I don't want to assume anything with these new rules.
> 
>William of Wolverhampton
> 
>
>>As for the Safety Zone / woods thing, I'd say this, which I can codify if necessary:
>>
>>"A safety zone is defined as an area where the marshal and shooters have sufficient visibility to manage the safety of the range."
>>
>>
>>Thoughts on that wording?
>>
>>K
>> 
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20100308/d2bf05c1/attachment-0003.htm>