[Archers] Fw: Stierbach indoor archery practice and is new rule correctly numbered?

[Kynnyth Pyke]

 I understand your hesitation as we've removed some of the prerogative of the MIC-Target Archery by requiring a waiver.  In all other cases, your judgement is what we use.  It is indeed a judgement call.  You have to be willing to back your decision that there was sufficient visibility.  I have in the recent past and will in the future hold marshals accountable for their judgement.

Make sure you are thinking about safety and not just convenience.

K



________________________________
From: Charles Oliff <caergarchery at gmail.com>
To: Kingdom Archery List <archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org>
Sent: Mon, March 8, 2010 10:40:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Archers] Fw: Stierbach indoor archery practice and is new rule correctly numbered?


does this safety zone definition mean that we can't have part of our safety zone go into woods?
 
The way it is worded, I read this as it being a mic judgement call, but I don't want to assume anything with these new rules.
 
William of Wolverhampton
 

>As for the Safety Zone / woods thing, I'd say this, which I can codify if necessary:
>
>"A safety zone is defined as an area where the marshal and shooters have sufficient visibility to manage the safety of the range."
>
>
>Thoughts on that wording?
>
>K
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/pipermail/archers-atlantia.sca.org/attachments/20100308/1c24e786/attachment-0003.htm>