[Archers] Fw: Stierbach indoor archery practice and is new rule correctly numbered?

[Kynnyth Pyke]

I'm happy to provide clarifying language, as I want to balance your needs and the needs of the marshallate.

However, given that this office, through Allen has stated that it does provide the coverage you need, go forward with that.  That is how this works.  An interpretation through this office is binding.  It is in the best interest of the Kingdom to move that interpretation into policy for clarity, but it is still binding.  If you have a structure that provides the protection described in 3.9.3.2.3 you are alleviated of the burden to grab a waiver.

Kynny



----- Original Message ----
From: Siegfried <siegfried at crossbows.biz>
To: archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
Sent: Mon, March 8, 2010 10:17:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Archers] Fw: Stierbach indoor archery practice and is new rule correctly numbered?

> So folks, 3.9.3.2.3 should address indoor sites...how does it affect your other event sites?

Actually, I'd state that it doesn't.  For the new rule 3.9.3.2.2
specifically states:

"A waiver may be requested for shorter ranges provided there is a
physical barrier, which will stop arrows."

Therefore clarifying 3.9.3.2.3 which gives examples/clarifications of
physical barriers, but not does conflict with the new 3.9.3.2.2, which
as written explicitly states that waivers will be needed in the case of
physical barriers.

Siegfried


-- 
Barun Siegfried Sebastian Faust - Barony of Highland Foorde - Atlantia
http://hf.atlantia.sca.org/ - http://crossbows.biz/ - http://eliw.com/
_______________________________________________
Archers mailing list
Archers at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org
http://seahorse.atlantia.sca.org/listinfo.cgi/archers-atlantia.sca.org